<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lutfar Rahman Nirjhar&#039;s Blog &#187; Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nirjhar.com/category/browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nirjhar.com</link>
	<description>..!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 12:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Facebook actually a Phishing site according to Google Chrome!</title>
		<link>http://www.nirjhar.com/2008/12/facebook-actually-a-phishing-site-according-to-google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nirjhar.com/2008/12/facebook-actually-a-phishing-site-according-to-google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nirjhar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirjhar.com/2008/12/facebook-actually-a-phishing-site-according-to-google-chrome/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Google,
Facebook is not Phishing site. Please update your database. Is this a cause of search deal?
Screen clipping taken: 12/3/2008, 4:44 PM
What is the hell! Google Chrome is saying Facebook.com is a phishing site! Can anyone facing the same problem? Please let me know.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Google,</p>
<p>Facebook is not Phishing site. Please update your database. Is this a cause of search deal?<a href="http://www.nirjhar.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/clip-image001.png"><img title="clip_image001" style="display: inline" height="455" alt="clip_image001" src="http://www.nirjhar.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/clip-image001-thumb.png" width="603" /></a></p>
<p>Screen clipping taken: 12/3/2008, 4:44 PM</p>
<p>What is the hell! Google Chrome is saying Facebook.com is a phishing site! Can anyone facing the same problem? Please let me know.</p>
<div id="st200811092854" class="st-taf"><script src="http://cdn.socialtwist.com/200811092854/script.js"></script><img style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;" src="http://images.socialtwist.com/200811092854/button.png" onmouseout="hideHoverMap(this)" onmouseover="showHoverMap(this, '200811092854',  'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nirjhar.com%2F2008%2F12%2Ffacebook-actually-a-phishing-site-according-to-google-chrome%2F', 'Facebook+actually+a+Phishing+site+according+to+Google+Chrome%21')" onclick="cw(this, {id:'200811092854',link: 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nirjhar.com%2F2008%2F12%2Ffacebook-actually-a-phishing-site-according-to-google-chrome%2F', title: '+Facebook+actually+a+Phishing+site+according+to+Google+Chrome%21+' })"/></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nirjhar.com/2008/12/facebook-actually-a-phishing-site-according-to-google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome is here!!!!!!!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.nirjhar.com/2008/09/google-chrome-is-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nirjhar.com/2008/09/google-chrome-is-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nirjhar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bangla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bengli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fastest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[js]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael arington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nirjhar.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirjhar.com/2008/09/google-chrome-is-here/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last I have installed it. It is really great. You can download it from http://www.google.com/chrome.  It is light and fast. I have tried this with 78tabs. It wasn&#8217;t crushed! Thanks Google. It is really a great relief to me. Please make sure to bye bye Firefox and IE.
Thanks for great support in Bangla. Ii [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Google Chrome" href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://www.nirjhar.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chrome-205-noshadow.png" border="0" alt="chrome-205_noshadow" width="209" height="209" align="left" /></a>At last I have installed it. It is really great. You can download it from <a title="http://www.google.com/chrome" href="http://www.google.com/chrome">http://www.google.com/chrome</a>.  It is light and fast. I have tried this with 78tabs. It wasn&#8217;t crushed! Thanks Google. It is really a great relief to me. Please make sure to bye bye Firefox and IE.</p>
<p>Thanks for great support in Bangla. Ii is perfect. I can see my <a href="http://www.nijrhar.com">www.nijrhar.com</a> smoothly. I&#8217;ll use this browser for the next 96hours (it is already my default browser). I am really impressed by the beauty of grabbing my favorite (other browser).</p>
<p>Dear Friends and Colleagues,</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be my pleasure if you start using it! I can assure you, this is a great browser!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nirjhar.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image.png"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://www.nirjhar.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image-thumb.png" border="0" alt="image" width="602" height="376" /></a></p>
<p>I can read my beloved Bangla smoothly. <img src='http://www.nirjhar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Here is the current market shares between browsers. This report is based on <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com" target="_blank">TechCrunch</a>. Thanks goes to Mike. I am his great fan!</p>
<p><img class="border" src="http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chrometc.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="237" /></p>
<p>Below what Michael Arington (www.techcrunch.com) says:</p>
<p style="margin: 1em 0px; line-height: 150%;">There have been a number of timed and anecdotal speed tests performed on Google Chrome over the last couple of days.</p>
<p style="margin: 1em 0px; line-height: 150%;">My personal testing: Chrome is the fastest browser I have ever used. More structured TechCrunch testing showed similar results:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: #008d00;" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/02/giving-google-chrome-a-spin-this-thing-moves-fast/">It’s fast</a>. Here are what others came up with:</p>
<p style="margin: 1em 0px; line-height: 150%;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: #008d00;" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/news.cnet.com');" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10030888-92.html">CNET agrees<img id="snap_com_shot_link_icon" class="snap_preview_icon" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 1px 0px 0px; max-height: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-family: 'trebuchet ms',arial,helvetica,sans-serif; left: auto; top: auto; line-height: normal; background-color: transparent; background-image: url(http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/theme/silver/palette.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; width: 14px; height: 12px; text-decoration: none; position: static; vertical-align: top; display: inline; visibility: visible; float: none ! important; max-width: 620px; background-position: -1128px 0px;" src="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/t.gif" alt="" /></a>, but their approach was biased towards Google. Chrome came out way ahead in a suite of Javascript benchmark tests. The only problem is that<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: #008d00;" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/code.google.com');" href="http://code.google.com/apis/v8/run.html">Google hosts the tests<img id="snap_com_shot_link_icon" class="snap_preview_icon" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 1px 0px 0px; max-height: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-family: 'trebuchet ms',arial,helvetica,sans-serif; left: auto; top: auto; line-height: normal; background-color: transparent; background-image: url(http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/theme/silver/palette.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; width: 14px; height: 12px; text-decoration: none; position: static; vertical-align: top; display: inline; visibility: visible; float: none ! important; max-width: 620px; background-position: -1128px 0px;" src="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/t.gif" alt="" /></a>and flat out says they tuned their<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: #008d00;" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/code.google.com');" href="http://code.google.com/apis/v8/intro.html">V8 Javascript engine<img id="snap_com_shot_link_icon" class="snap_preview_icon" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 1px 0px 0px; max-height: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-family: 'trebuchet ms',arial,helvetica,sans-serif; left: auto; top: auto; line-height: normal; background-color: transparent; background-image: url(http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/theme/silver/palette.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; width: 14px; height: 12px; text-decoration: none; position: static; vertical-align: top; display: inline; visibility: visible; float: none ! important; max-width: 620px; background-position: -1128px 0px;" src="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/t.gif" alt="" /></a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>around them. The test does show Chrome coming out way ahead of other browsers (for me, Chrome had a score of 403 v. IE7’s 18). Try it out for yourself.</p>
<p style="margin: 1em 0px; line-height: 150%;">And also try the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: #008d00;" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www2.webkit.org');" href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider.html">SunSpider Javascript benchmark<img id="snap_com_shot_link_icon" class="snap_preview_icon" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 1px 0px 0px; max-height: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-family: 'trebuchet ms',arial,helvetica,sans-serif; left: auto; top: auto; line-height: normal; background-color: transparent; background-image: url(http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/theme/silver/palette.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; width: 14px; height: 12px; text-decoration: none; position: static; vertical-align: top; display: inline; visibility: visible; float: none ! important; max-width: 620px; background-position: -1128px 0px;" src="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/t.gif" alt="" /></a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>test as well. Firefox’s new build, which runs the TraceMonkey engine, comes in<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: #008d00;" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/03/mozilla-fights-back-with-new-firefox-benchmarks/">marginally faster</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>than Chrome there.</p>
<p style="margin: 1em 0px; line-height: 150%;">Today Yahoo’s Zimbra team also<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: #008d00;" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.zimbrablog.com');" href="http://www.zimbrablog.com/blog/archives/2008/09/lets-talk-speed-chrome-and-webkit.html">published<img id="snap_com_shot_link_icon" class="snap_preview_icon" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 1px 0px 0px; max-height: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-family: 'trebuchet ms',arial,helvetica,sans-serif; left: auto; top: auto; line-height: normal; background-color: transparent; background-image: url(http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/theme/silver/palette.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; width: 14px; height: 12px; text-decoration: none; position: static; vertical-align: top; display: inline; visibility: visible; float: none ! important; max-width: 620px; background-position: -1128px 0px;" src="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/t.gif" alt="" /></a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>their own test results based on how well different browsers ran the Javascript-heavy Zimbra web application. No surprise: Chrome<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: #008d00;" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.zimbrablog.com');" href="http://www.zimbrablog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/totalrendertime.png">beat<img id="snap_com_shot_link_icon" class="snap_preview_icon" style="border-width: 0px; margin: 0px ! important; padding: 1px 0px 0px; max-height: 2000px; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-family: 'trebuchet ms',arial,helvetica,sans-serif; left: auto; top: auto; line-height: normal; background-color: transparent; background-image: url(http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/theme/silver/palette.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; width: 14px; height: 12px; text-decoration: none; position: static; vertical-align: top; display: inline; visibility: visible; float: none ! important; max-width: 620px; background-position: -1128px 0px;" src="http://i.ixnp.com/images/v3.46/t.gif" alt="" /></a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>the pants off of Firefox and (especially) IE8. But…Safari came in slightly ahead of Chrome.</p>
<p style="margin: 1em 0px; line-height: 150%;">So Is Chrome the fastest browser? Who knows. It clearly runs Javascript, at least, very well. But more important than these speed tests is Google’s build on Mac and Linux. A lot of users are still sitting on the sidelines, waiting to try it out.</p>
<div id="st200811092854" class="st-taf"><script src="http://cdn.socialtwist.com/200811092854/script.js"></script><img style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;" src="http://images.socialtwist.com/200811092854/button.png" onmouseout="hideHoverMap(this)" onmouseover="showHoverMap(this, '200811092854',  'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nirjhar.com%2F2008%2F09%2Fgoogle-chrome-is-here%2F', 'Google+Chrome+is+here%21%21%21%21%21%21%21%21%21')" onclick="cw(this, {id:'200811092854',link: 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nirjhar.com%2F2008%2F09%2Fgoogle-chrome-is-here%2F', title: '+Google+Chrome+is+here%21%21%21%21%21%21%21%21%21+' })"/></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nirjhar.com/2008/09/google-chrome-is-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
